Saturday, March 12, 2022

Psychiatrists Have Taken 170 Years to Apologize for History of Racism


This is a radio show. Call in number 310-861-2349



The Racism of Former American Psychiatric Association President Jeffrey Lieberman, Chair of the Columbia University Department of Psychiatry, has caused him to resign. His tweet about Model Nyakim Gatwech has drawn international condemnation and demands of his resignation - https://www.cchrint.org/2022/02/25/psychiatrists-racist-tweet-about-model-nyakim-gatwech/





 
• Rev. Fred Shaw, Anti-Racism Task Force Leader, Joins Calls for APA President and Columbia University Psychiatrist Jeffrey Lieberman to Resign All Advisory and Executive Positions in Light of Blatant Racist Tweet.

• Lieberman has a controversial past, including being irrationally critical of anyone opposing his or psychiatry’s works—making accusations of the type that are now being similarly directed at him, but with merit.

• The Columbia Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons wrote to leaders at four institutions affiliated with Lieberman questioning if New York Presbyterian Hospital is safe for students and patients of color.

• Rev. Shaw states, “As an African American and human rights advocate, I am appalled that Ms. Gatwech was subject to this racial abuse,” Rev. Shaw calls for Lieberman’s resignation from all executive and advisory positions he holds internationally, including with pharmaceutical companies.


By CCHR International
Mental Health Industry Watchdog


February 25, 2022

 

Former American Psychiatric Association president Jeffrey Lieberman, Chair of the Columbia University Department of Psychiatry, has been suspended after issuing a racist post on his Twitter account about a dark-skinned model, Ms. Nyakim Gatwech.

 


He was subsequently removed from his position as psychiatrist-in-chief at Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital and forced to resigned from his role as executive director of the New York State Psychiatric Institute.[1] However, Rev. Frederick Shaw, president of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Inglewood South Bay branch and founder of the Task Force Against Racism and Modern-Day Eugenics, said Lieberman’s subsequent trite apology to Ms. Gatwech, was grossly inadequate for someone of his stature in psychiatry.

“Jeffrey Lieberman’s apology to the model, Ms. Nyakim Gatwech, was trite and grossly inadequate for someone of his stature in psychiatry. As an African American and human rights advocate, I am appalled that Ms. Gatwech was subject to this racial abuse.” – Rev. Frederick Shaw, founder of CCHR’s Task Force Against Racism and Modern-Day Eugenics

“As an African American and human rights advocate, I am appalled that Ms. Gatwech was subject to this racial abuse,” Rev. Shaw said.




He called for Lieberman’s resignation from all executive and advisory positions he holds internationally, including with pharmaceutical companies—from the U.S. to Spain.

Lieberman tweeted in response to a photo of Ms. Gatwech, an American model of South Sudanese descent, that her skin color was possibly a “freak of nature.”



In an email to his colleagues before he was suspended, Lieberman apologized for the tweet, describing it as “racist and sexist.” He added that he was “deeply ashamed” of his “prejudices and stereotypical assumptions.”[2]

 


But Rev Shaw said the apology was “public relations rhetoric. This is no light-weight psychiatrist, he’s the former head of the American Psychiatric Association, and has been a researcher for the National Institute of Mental Health and served on its National Advisory Mental Health Council; he also served on the advisory board of the Food and Drug Administration advisory committee for Neuropharmacologic and Psychopharmacologic Drugs and has been on the editorial boards of numerous journals. We shall approach all of them to have Dr. Lieberman be removed as an expert and denied future official affiliations.”[3]

 


The New York state Office of Mental Health, which operates the New York State Psychiatric Institute, asked Lieberman to resign as director, stating: “The Office of Mental Health took immediate action after learning of Dr. Lieberman’s offensive and inappropriate comments on social media. As of February 22, he is no longer affiliated with OMH or the State of New York,” said agency spokesperson Jessica Zahn.[4]

 

The government-funded position with the New York State Psychiatric Institute paid Lieberman almost $250,000 annually in 2020 and 2021, according to payroll records.[5] 

“To not understand how racist language like that is harmful when your profession is supposed to care for the mental health of people makes you unqualified to be a psychiatrist at all, let alone the chief of the top program.” – Dr. Elle Lett, a postdoctoral fellow in medicine at the University of Pennsylvania[6]

“This man held the sentiments that shaped the department. This is a reckoning for institutional change,” Lett told THE CITY. “I don’t trust him or the people he trained of being stewards of mental health to Black women.[7]

“Jeffrey Lieberman’s comment is not surprising given psychiatry’s long history of fueling racism and harming African Americans and minorities.” – Rev. Frederick Shaw

In April 2021, the APA issued a formal apology over what it called psychiatry’s “role in perpetrating structural racism” and “history of actions…that hurt Black, Indigenous, and People of Color” (BIPOC).[8] It took them over 170 years to apologize, which the Task Force rejected.  APA’s response to Lieberman’s comment was unremarkable and self-serving. Its Board of Trustees issued a statement, saying it “reiterates its position that both racism and sexism harm the APA as an organization, the field of psychiatry, and the people and communities we serve. Past APA presidents do not speak for, or on behalf of, the APA.”[9]



Rev. Shaw says the APA needs to take a much stronger stand—removing Lieberman’s past presidential title and issuing other sanctions.

Lieberman’s post, with a photo of Ms. Gatwech, was not only racist but also sexist. “It is not a work of art made of black stone or granite,” read the original tweet, published by a user with the handle @zg4ever. Further, he wrote that Gatwech “is in the Guinness Book of World Records for the darkest skin on Earth. But in 2020, Guinness tweeted and clarified that it does not monitor skin tone.” [10]



Rev. Shaw, also a spokesperson for the mental health watchdog Citizens Commission on Human Rights International, which helped found the Task Force Against Racism and Modern-Day Eugenics, notes examples of psychiatry’s racist history:

  • In 1792 Benjamin Rush, the “father of American psychiatry,” declared that African American’s skin color derived from a “disease” called Negritude, which he theorized was a form of leprosy. The “cure” was when their skin turned “white.[11]


  • In the 1950s U.S. psychiatrist J.C. Carothers argued that in many ways the African resembles a European 8- or 9-year-old child in his reaction to the environment. He compared Africans to a “leucotomized European.”[12]

 

  • 1960s: Psychiatrists claimed civil rights protests caused violent “schizophrenic” symptoms in “Negro populations,” calling this “protest psychosis.” African American men were said to have developed “hostile and aggressive feelings” and “delusional anti-whiteness after listening to civil rights leaders.” Ads for antipsychotics used African symbols to reflect so-called “violent traits” in Blacks.[13]

 



  • 1990s: NIMH Director, psychiatrist Frederick Goodwin, compared Black youth to “hyperaggressive” and “hypersexual” monkeys in a jungle who only want to kill one another, have sex and reproduce. He was forced to resign. He helped developed a “Violence Initiative” program to look for a “violent” gene in African Americans and Hispanics that could be controlled by psychiatric drugs, including the antidepressant Prozac—known to cause violent and suicidal behavior.[14]

 

  • 1990s: As reported by The Black Chronicle, The New York State Psychiatric Institute has its own history of racial discrimination and questionable practices. The facility came under fire in 1998 after news broke of research involving Black and Latino children targeted to test a theory about criminal or violent behavior and given a drug that was later pulled from the market. According to The New York Times, the researchers targeted boys 6-10 who were the younger brothers of people labeled at the time as “delinquents.”

 

Shaw rejected explanations for Lieberman’s behavior, including Robert Klitzman, a professor of psychiatry at Columbia, who described the episode as “unfortunate” and said it “really highlights how deep and pervasive some of our own unconscious biases can be.”[15] “I don’t believe this was some ‘unconscious’ bias,” Shaw said. “You could never excuse slave owners’ brutality by saying they were ‘unconsciously’ indoctrinated in the fraudulent idea that Africans were genetically inferior to white humans, justifying their enslavement.”



Comments from others include:

  • “We condemn the racism and sexism reflected in Dr. Lieberman’s tweet and acknowledge and share the hurt, sadness, confusion, and distressing emotions you may be feeling,” Thomas Smith, the new acting director of the New York Psychiatric Institute and other leaders said in an email to staff. [16] 
  • “It’s unconscionable that anyone would post that anywhere—it is nothing but hurtful and propagates racism. That it was a psychiatrist in such a position of power and authority makes it that much worse. An apology is no longer enough—that is just words.” – Dr. Daniel Block, psychiatrist[17]
  • A dozen doctors called the Coalition of Concerned Analysts of Color at Columbia sent a mass email to the psychiatric department demanding Lieberman’s resignation, condemning his beliefs and stating: “We do not support such views and condemn these beliefs and actions. Nor do we support a department that continues to employ anyone holding them….”[18] 

 

  • The Columbia Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons wrote to leaders at four institutions affiliated with Lieberman questioning if New York Presbyterian Hospital is safe for students and patients of color.[19] 

 

Lieberman’s Past Comments: “self-promotional and condescending” ….

Lieberman has a controversial past, including being irrationally critical of anyone opposing his or psychiatry’s works—making accusations of the type that are now being similarly directed at him, but with merit.

  • In 2013, Lieberman was APA president when the organization’s Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) was released, garnering international criticism from mental health professionals with threats to boycott its use. Lieberman told Psychiatric News that he’d hired a public relations firm to address psychiatrists being “stigmatized” in the wake of this outcry over the manual.
  • “Psychiatry remains blind to the fact that it is its own spurious pathologizing of its clients that creates the stigma. It has no interest in genuine reform, but instead is embarked on a tawdry PR campaign to whitewash its transgressions and sell its concepts to the media, stakeholders, and the general public.” – Psychologist Philip Hickey, Ph.D.[20]
  • “Tawdry PR explains both his comments at that time and today,” Rev. Shaw opined. Lieberman justified the DSM-5, stating “…it represents a system that is as good as we can have, given our current state of knowledge” and psychiatry has “no better alternative.”[21]

 

  • Judy Stone, writing in Scientific American, commented on Lieberman’s criticism of those expressing disfavor toward DSM-5. She called his views “self-promotional and condescending,” adding that he “stoops to disparaging characterizations of critics…” Dr. Stone quipped: “…it makes me wonder if there is a DSM-5 diagnosis for someone who is self-serving, can’t accept criticism, and believes critics are prejudiced bigots?”[22] 

 

  • Further, Dr. Stone wrote: “I was very disappointed to see Dr. Lieberman’s shallow, self-serving and evidence-free diatribe appear in Scientific American as a guest opinion. He failed to reveal important conflicts of interest. He made serious claims for which he presented no evidence. He has made thinly veiled personal attacks on his critics, without offering anything substantive to counter rationally.”

 

  • With Frederick Goodwin targeting African American children targeted to be drugged with Prozac in the late eighties to “curb” their supposed “violence,”, it is notable that in 1991, Lieberman was a member of the FDA’s Pharmacologic Drugs Advisory Board, which met to hear evidence that Prozac could cause violent and suicidal behavior. At the time, Lieberman had financial ties to antidepressant makers.[23] Despite damning evidence, the committee refused to support a warning that Prozac or antidepressants could cause violent/suicidal behavior. (Since then, dozens of school shootings have been linked to teens taking antidepressants documented to cause hostility.)

 

  • In 1997, Lieberman helped with the formation of the International Early Psychosis Association, along with Australian psychiatrist, Patrick McGorry. Between 2002 and 2010, Lieberman was Vice President for the group’s North America sector and in 2014, was Vice President for the entire group. McGorry came under criticism for promoting the theory of “Psychosis-Risk Syndrome” for which individuals from age 14 could be arbitrarily determined to be at risk or developing psychosis and drugged with antipsychotics before the onset of psychosis to “prevent” it. The problem was that the “diagnosis” had a more than 80% false positive rate and psychosis is a side effect of antipsychotics.[24] Lieberman and McGorry are on the Editorial Board of The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry—a position Lieberman should resign from.

 

  • In 2003, in response to British regulators warning doctors not to prescribe antidepressants to those aged 18 and younger because of the risk of suicide, Lieberman told The New York Times, ‘‘I think they’re really overreacting. This is really going way too far, and in the process doing more harm than good.’’[25] However, in 2004, the FDA also found that antidepressant use in youngsters and young adults could cause suicidal behavior. It then mandated manufacturers to place a black box notice on drug packaging, warning of the risk of suicide. After the FDA issued the warning, Lieberman’s rhetoric changed, now claiming there “wasn’t sufficient evidence to support a link between these drugs and suicide,” in 1991.[26]

 

One former trainee of Lieberman told THE CITY in the wake of his current racist comments that no one was “surprised” by his remarks:

Everyone had a very low opinion of him [Lieberman] but no one says or does anything about it.” He was very powerful, that “If you write a grant, he has to write the letter of support.” – Former trainee of Lieberman[27]

Rev. Shaw adds: “This is the character of the man who now—in response to his racist comments said: ‘An apology from me to the Black community, to women, and to all of you is not enough. I’ve hurt many, and I am beginning to understand the work ahead to make needed personal changes and over time to regain your trust.’”[28]

 

Rev. Shaw called the apology self-serving and reiterated that Lieberman should be denounced internationally and any pharmaceutical company affiliations should remove him as a speaker, consultant, advisory board member or researcher. In December 2020, a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company in Spain, announced collaboration with Lieberman and other researchers from Columbia University that the Task Force will seek revocation of the relationship.[29]

 

Rev. Shaw’s Task Force will write to government agencies and private companies and organizations to ask them to remove Lieberman as one of their experts and will also contact psychiatric agencies or groups planning on having him as a speaker.[30]

 

The Task Force Against Racism and Modern-Day Eugenics comprises over 100 African American community members that want to see racism eliminated from the mental health field and greater accountability instituted in the psychiatric industry for racist and harmful treatment of minorities.

References:

[1] Lola Fadulu, “Columbia Psychiatry Chair Suspended After Tweet About Dark-Skinned Model: The post from Jeffrey Lieberman, which described the model as possibly a ‘freak of nature,’ drew negative attention from medical professionals,” The New York Times, 23 Feb 2022, Updated 24 Feb 2020, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/23/nyregion/columbia-jeffrey-lieberman.html

[2] Ibid.

[3] “Interview: In search of the pathophysiology and prevention of schizophrenia,”

Lieberman, Jeffrey A., Neuropsychiatry; London Vol. 1, Iss. 3, (Jun 2011): 225-231. DOI:10.2217/npy.11.30, https://www.proquest.com/docview/912446471

[4] Josefa Velasquez “A Racist Tweet by Columbia Psychiatry Chair Ripples Through New York’s Elite Medical Circles,” The City, 24 Feb. 2022, https://www.thecity.nyc/2022/2/24/22949146/racist-tweet-columbia-psychiatry-chair-jeffrey-lieberman-new-york-medical-elite

[5] Ibid.

[6] Op. cit., The New York Times

[7] Op cit., The City

[8] https://www.cchrint.org/2021/01/26/american-psychiatric-associations-apology-for-harming-african-americans-rejected/, citing: Megan Brooks, “APA Apologizes for Past Support of Racism in Psychiatry,” Medscape, 19 Jan 2019, https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/944352?src=wnl_edit_tpal&uac=345404PY&impID=3143084&faf=1

[9] Anna Madaris Miller, “Top psychiatrist suspended after tweeting about a Black model, using the phrase ‘freak of nature,’“ Insider, 24 Feb 2022, https://www.insider.com/columbia-psychiatrist-jeffrey-lieberman-suspended-tweet-black-model-2022-2

[10] Nick Mordowanec, “Columbia Psychiatry Chair Suspended After ‘Racist’ Tweet About Black Model,” Newsweek, 24 Feb. 2022, https://www.newsweek.com/columbia-psychiatry-chair-deactivates-twitter-account-after-racist-tweet-1681877

[11] https://www.cchrint.org/2021/01/26/american-psychiatric-associations-apology-for-harming-african-americans-rejected/, citing: Prof. Thomas Szasz, M.D., The Manufacture of Madness: A Comparative Study of the Inquisition and the Mental Health Movement, Jan. 1970, p. 154

[12] https://www.cchrtaskforce.org/articles/mental-health-racism

[13] https://www.cchrint.org/2019/07/17/minority-mental-health-month-may-spell-mental-health-slavery/ citing Jonathan M. Metzl, The Protest Psychosis, How Schizophrenia became a Black Disease, (Beacon Press, Boston, 2009), pp. xii, xiv, p. 101

[14] https://www.cchrint.org/2020/06/16/naacp-inglewood-executive-educates-about-psychiatric-racism/ citing “U.S. Hasn’t Given Up Linking Genes to Crime,” The New York Times, 18 Sept. 1992, https://www.nytimes.com/1992/09/18/opinion/l-us-hasn-t-given-up-linking-genes-to-crime-153192.html

[15] Op. cit., The New York Times

[16] Ibid.

[17] Ronny Reyes, “Columbia University psychiatry department chair is suspended after referring to a dark-skinned model as ‘a freak of nature’” Daily Mail, 24 Feb 2022, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10548689/Columbia-University-prof-suspended-referring-dark-skinned-model-freak-nature.html

[18] Op. cit., The City

[19] Op. cit., Insider

[20] https://www.cchrint.org/2021/03/08/resource-on-why-psychiatry-is-upset-about-its-failures-and-critics/

[21] https://www.cchrint.org/2021/03/08/resource-on-why-psychiatry-is-upset-about-its-failures-and-critics/, citing: Michael Vlessides, “The Past, Present, and Future of the DSM,” Medscape, 15 Dec. 2020, https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/942694

[22] https://www.cchrint.org/2021/03/08/resource-on-why-psychiatry-is-upset-about-its-failures-and-critics/, citing: Judy Stone, “Anti-Psychiatry Prejudice? A response to Dr. Lieberman,” Scientific American, 24 May 2013, https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/molecules-to-medicine/anti-psychiatry-prejudice-a-response-to-dr-lieberman/

[23] Talking Back to Prozac: What Doctors Aren’t Telling You About Today’s Most Controversial Drug Mass Market, 1994, pp. 198, 285

[24] Sue Dunlevy, “US expert slams Patrick McGorry’s psychosis model,” The Australian, 14 June 2011, https://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/us-expert-slams-patrick-mcgorrys-psychosis-model/news-story/17af8dc06430231afbf44bc9df2d38bf

[25] Erica Goode, “British Warning on Antidepressant Use for Youth,” The New York Times, 11 Dec. 2003, http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/11/world/british-warning-on-antidepressant-use-for-youth.html

[26] http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/963903/posts

[27] Op cit., The City

[28] Olafimihan Oshin, “Columbia chair suspended after tweet about model of South Sudanese descent,” The Hill, 23 Feb. 2022, https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/595599-columbia-chair-suspended-after-tweet-about-black-model

[29] https://www.einnews.com/pr_news/532992356/oryzon-launches-pioneering-schizophrenia-precision-medicine-study-in-collaboration-with-columbia-psychiatry

[30] https://www.speakerbookingagency.com/talent/jeffrey-lieberman

 

Questions?
Sandy McNownDirector of Public Activities, CCHR International
s.mcnown@cchr.org www.cchrint.org 

Toll-Free: 1(800)-869-2247 x602
Phone: 1(323)-467-4242 x602

Sponsored by Walter Davis

https://wealthwave.com/walterdavis





Saturday, March 5, 2022

Child Drugging, Restraints, Racism and Electroshock

 


Child Drugging, Restraints, Racism and Electroshock

Join me and Rev. Fred Shaw as we explore electroshock programs in our broken mental health treatment system.



We MUST stop this! Gov. Newsome is proposing that homeless people be FORCED into mental health treatment. The majority of homeless people are...children. People will be forced into a broken mental health system. Parents are being forced to place their kids into an abusive system.



Join us for this radio show, 11AM PST Sunday 6 March 2022. Call in number 310-861-2349.

https://www.blogtalkradio.com/progressintheworld/2022/03/06/child-drugging-restraints-racism-and-electroshock

If you cannot join live, listen to the archived version and please, share, educate yourselves, TAKE ACTION!



Some Facts on electroshock:     Restraints, Psychiatric Drugs and Electroshock are the therapies used on children, some younger than 5 yrs old. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) reveals that 22 states are currently administering electroshock to children. Four of those states are electroshocking children aged 0-5 years old.



Social Workers and other mental health officials can FORCE YOU to medicate or electro shock your children.



Until laws ban restraint use, file criminal complaints and civil lawsuits if your child is damaged from being physically or chemically restrained. If your child has been abused, you can report this to the Citizens Commission on Human Rights.



If you feel your rights as a parent have been disregarded or you are being bullied by the psychiatric industry, contact CCHR.



Sandy McNown Director of Public Activities, CCHR International
s.mcnown@cchr.org
www.cchrint.org 

Toll-Free: 1(800)-869-2247 x602
Phone: 1(323)-467-4242 x602


Sunday, February 27, 2022

Killology-A POLICE TACTIC THAT ENDANGERS US ALL


This is a radio show on PROGRESS IN THE WORLD. Sunday 27 February 2022 at 11 AM Pacific. 

What psychological or psychiatric methods are still being taught police for racial profiling and training police officers. Clearly, what is being used is not working and is adversely impacting—sometimes lethally—not just minorities but also the police. – Rev. Frederick Shaw



 

With numerous articles exposing the dangers of “fear-based warrior-training” recently, CCHR’s Task Force Against Racism adds information to its website, calling on police to investigate the link between psychological training and use of unnecessary force.


By CCHR International
The Mental Health Industry Watchdog
September 15, 2020

The Citizens Commission on Human Rights International’s Task Force Against Racism & Modern-Day Eugenics launched a new educational page and warning on its website about a psychological training program used by police which may induce rather than reduce violence.

 

Craig Atkinson, filmmaker and director of the 2016 Tribeca Award-winning documentary, Do Not Resist, believed the decades-old “fear-based,” “warrior training 100 percent has to be put under a microscope and analyzed” and “less people would die.”[1] Four years later, Task Force founder, Rev. Frederick Shaw, a former Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Deputy, reiterates this need.




 

Shaw wants to know: “What psychological or psychiatric methods are still being taught police for racial profiling and training police officers. Clearly, what is being used is not working and is adversely impacting—sometimes lethally—not just minorities but also the police.”

“Fear-based” police officer training was developed by former West Point professor of psychology, the former Lt. Col. Dave Grossman.[2] He invented the term and theory of “killology,” defined as: “the scholarly study of the destructive act.”

 

Teaching it for more than 20 years, the premise is that police officers are “at war” on the domestic front and need psychological training to become “warriors” to overcome their natural resistance to killing.[3] It “often runs the risk of the use of unnecessary, and sometimes, fatal force,” a Mother Jones article reported in May 2020.[4]

 

The training teaches officers to be “emotionally” and “psychologically” prepared to kill. If you’re prepared to kill, Grossman said, it’s “just not that big of a deal.”[5] In a 2004 interview with PBS’s Frontline, Grossman said, “The only way to overcome that resistance [to killing] is through operate conditioning, to make killing a condition reflex. And we’ve done that.” [6]

 

The July 6, 2016 shooting of a 32-year-old African American man, killed by a Minnesota police officer during a traffic stop, raised the alarm about “warrior” training. The officer had undergone 56 hours of warrior training in 2014.[7] Atkinson called warrior training the “number-one issue” that’s getting people unnecessarily killed by police.[8]

 

Shaw says that with all police killings, investigations should include whether officers involved were subjected to this type of training. “I am a former law enforcement officer and have been racially profiled for being Black. But not all cops are bad. Most are good, decent people. But we know that racial profiling has been occurring since slavery and eugenics. When this is incorporated into law enforcement training, Black lives can be at serious risk. Police need to know this.”

https://www.cchrint.org/2020/09/15/task-force-wants-psychological-killology-police-training-investigated/

The Task Force website details the history of behavioral scientists in law enforcement from 1916, when eugenics thrived in the U.S.[9] During the Civil Rights Movement in the sixties, psychologists worked with police agencies following “urban riots.”[10] African Americans marching against racism and injustice were labeled with a mental disorder, “protest psychosis.” The International Journal of Social Psychiatry reported that Blacks developed delusions of grandiosity and “dangerous aggressive dealings” when they joined civil rights sit-ins.[11]

 

Another leading U.S. police psychologist has come under question, including in a 2015 New York Times article, when his theories were heavily criticized as pseudoscience, “invalid and unreliable.”  The Justice Department denounced the psychologist’s findings as “lacking in both foundation and reliability.” Civil rights lawyers say he is selling dangerous ideas. “People die because of this stuff,” said John Burton, a California lawyer.[12]

 

Another psychologist, Professor of Criminology and Statistics and a police trainer interviewed for Atkinson’s documentary, takes profiling to a whole new frightening level, Shaw said. The professor purports to be able to forecast criminal behavior using statistical/machine learning procedures.[13] He also claims it can be predicted at someone’s birth how likely they are to commit a crime by aged 18.[14]

 

Shaw said that a recent article in The Trace showed “the very real concerns we should have.” It stated that “the warrior narrative has existed in law enforcement circles for decades,” with thousands of dollars spent “to teach tactics more suited for war than for civil society.”[15] “Racist training and stereotyping and now infant predictions of who will be become a criminal, is Brave New World at its worst,” Shaw added.

 

“How much of this is psychiatric or psychological-eugenics based is important to know,” Shaw said. “Racism creates a mindset that is hard to penetrate when its perpetrators are unwittingly programmed and convinced—through ‘science’ and ‘authoritative’ training—that what they are doing wrong is ‘right.’ It masks oppression and violence as ‘protection’ and ‘justice.’ This must change, starting with psychological methods of police training being investigated.”

References:

[1] “One of America’s most popular police trainers is teaching officers how to kill,” Insider, 2 Jun. 2020, https://www.insider.com/bulletproof-dave-grossman-police-trainer-teaching-officers-how-to-kill-2020-6; https://www.tribecafilm.com/festival/archive/award-screening-best-documentary-2016; https://www.tribecafilm.com/festival/archive/award-screening-best-documentary-2016

[2] https://www.killology.com/bio

[3] Fear-based training for police officers is challenged, Star Tribune, 11 Jul. 2018, https://www.startribune.com/fear-based-training-for-police-officers-is-challenged/487958041/; “The Role of Police Psychology in Controlling Excessive Force,” U.S. Dept. of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Apr. 1994, https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/146206NCJRS.pdf

[4] “Minneapolis Banned Warrior-Style Police Training. Its Police Union Kept Offering It Anyway,” Mother Jones, 28 May 2020, https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2020/05/bob-kroll-minneapolis-warrior-police-training/

[5] “One of America’s most popular police trainers is teaching officers how to kill,” Insider, 2 Jun. 2020, https://www.insider.com/bulletproof-dave-grossman-police-trainer-teaching-officers-how-to-kill-2020-6

[6] Interview, David Grossman, PBS Frontline, https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/heart/interviews/grossman.html

[7] https://apnews.com/4645f857141943118b5ad6fb57552b3b; https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/philando-castile-case-ex-officer-involved-fatal-shooting-gets-48-n781636

[8] https://www.insider.com/bulletproof-dave-grossman-police-trainer-teaching-officers-how-to-kill-2020-6;

[9] http://criminal-justice.iresearchnet.com/forensic-psychology/history-of-forensic-psychology/police-psychology/

[10] “The Role of Police Psychology in Controlling Excessive Force,” U.S. Dept. of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Apr. 1994, https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=168114

[11] https://bringmethenews.com/news/former-mn-professors-defense-of-deadly-force-by-police-is-used-often-but-criticized; https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/02/us/training-officers-to-shoot-first-and-he-will-answer-questions-later.html

[12] “Training Officers to Shoot First, and He Will Answer Questions Later,” New York Times, 2 Aug. 2015, https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/02/us/training-officers-to-shoot-first-and-he-will-answer-questions-later.html

[13] “Predicting prison terms and parole,” Downtown News Magazine, 24 Mar. 2020, https://www.downtownpublications.com/single-post/2020/03/24/Predicting-prison-terms-and-parole

[14] “This Guy Trains Computers to Find Future Criminals: Richard Berk says his algorithms take the bias out of criminal justice. But could they make it worse?” Bloomberg, 18 Jul, 2016, https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-richard-berk-future-crime/

[15] “The ‘Warrior Cop’ Is a Toxic Mentality. And a Lucrative Industry,” The Trace, 19 June 2020, https://www.thetrace.org/2020/06/warrior-cop-mentality-police-industry/





Reverend Frederick Shaw is the Director of Public Affairs and Spokesperson for the Citizens Commission on Human Rights International (CCHR), a more than 50-year mental health industry watchdog. He’s also the President of the NAACP Inglewood-South Bay Branch in California, with a long history of working with NAACP.  

He is the President of NAACP Inglewood/South Bay, as well as past President of the Compton Branch of the NAACP,  where he was the first President from Compton to be appointed to a California State Chair overseeing “The Children’s Taskforce.” Working in both the Compton and Inglewood-South Bay chapters, he met with many members of the U.S. Congress alongside CCHR International to get the Child Medication Safety Act passed, a federal law which prohibits schools from forcing students to take psychotropic drugs as a requisite for their education. This reinforces parents’ rights to refuse psychiatric drugs for their children and to determine their children’s healthcare needs.

In 2020, Rev. Shaw started a Task Force against Institutional Racism in the Psychiatric Industry, comprising African American attorneys, civil rights advocates, members of the clergy, medical doctors, psychologists and educators. The Task Force reminds African Americans of the mental health industry’s history of stigmatizing minorities—from labeling runaway slaves and civil rights protestors as mentally ill and the use of eugenics (population control that targeted African Americans, sterilizing them) to segregating children in schools and the foster-child-welfare system today and drugging them.  

Rev. Shaw is a native of Compton, CA and has worked in Compton for most of his life as a fierce advocate for children and adults in Civic and Human Rights. He has advocated and stressed the importance of education, and the reduction of poverty and drug addiction. His late mother, Marcine Shaw, was a sergeant in the Women’s Army Corp in 1950. For 18 years she was Senior Deputy to Los Angeles County Supervisors Kenneth Hahn and Yvonne Brathwaite-Burke and a Compton City Council member for six years and was described as a “foot soldier for human rights.”

  • After attending Pepperdine University, he was ordained in Religious Science in 1975.
  • Between 1980-1993, Rev. Shaw was a Los Angeles County Sheriff Deputy from, which included organizing and implementing the Sheriff’s Youth Athletic League.
  • In 1992, he was the co-founder and President of the World Literacy Crusade, an international organization with the purpose of eradicating poverty and hopelessness in the inner cities through education.
  • In 2005, The State of the African American Male and the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation honored Rev. Shaw as one of their recipients of the MEN WHO CARE AWARD, along with actor Jaime Fox.  He received this award for his demonstrated NAACP leadership skills and dedicated persistence to eliminate the drugging of children.
  • Rev Shaw co-founded the Basic Life Institute, an organization contracted with the State of California and County of Los Angeles serving at-risk youth from ages 12 – 18 years old.  The LA County Board of Supervisors awarded him for his work with foster care children and youth on probation.
  • For nearly three decades, Rev. Shaw has worked closely with CCHR International and is now its international spokesman while he also continues to work with NAACP.  From these positions, he has:

1.    Helped obtain three national Resolutions, two from the NAACP and one from the National Caucus of Black State Legislators that supported children’s rights not to be subjected coercive psychotropic drugs, to stop the psychotropic of foster care children and to prohibit electroshock.

2.    He traveled to South Africa in 1997 to attend the Truth & Reconciliation Commission (TRC) investigating apartheid crimes where he helped CCHR present evidence to the TRC about the role of psychiatric and psychological racism in introducing and maintaining apartheid, and how Africans were allowed to die from easily treatable medical conditions when locked up in slave labor psychiatric camps during apartheid.

3.    In November 2016, he led a march in South Africa against African children being subjected to dangerous psychotropic drugs and protested the World Psychiatric Association congress being held in the country.

4.    He has delivered seminars and speeches across the U.S. and is a regular guest on community radio shows and is quoted in press newswires, reaching millions.

5.    Rev Shaw also lends his powerful voice in defense of children around the world and continues to lead CCHR marches against the electroshocking of children.

Email him at FShawJr@yahoo.com



‍Sponsored by Walter Davis of Wealthwave

https://howmoneyworks.com/walterdavis

https://wealthwave.com/walterdavis

 

 


Thursday, February 17, 2022

Progress in the World: AMERICANS FIGHTING FOR JUSTICE THAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT

SPOTLIGHT: AMERICANS FIGHTING FOR JUSTICE THAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT



A new report likens America to China's Tiananmen Square for an untold number of Americans and non-citizen residents enduring U.S. legal system abuse. While America does not hesitate to use human rights organization reports to demonize countries like Russia and China, they fail to accept the findings when it is negative for the United States or Israel.

https://www.npr.org/2022/02/01/1077291879/israel-apartheid-state-amnesty-international

Amnesty International has found that Israel is an apartheid state and the United States government and various media outlets is calling the documented human rights violations, anti-Semitism.

If Russia, or China was arresting people at the rate of 1 person every 38 seconds (rate of arrests in the United States for the “drug war”), the United States government would be crying foul.

Further, channels like the History Channel, American focused on Hitler and his crimes. They do not focus so much on the crimes of the United States legal system that disproportionately target people of color and the poor.

This show is about two American women and their organizations that are fighting for you, and winning.

See this report. https://www.prlog.org/12904554-new-report-likens-america-to-chinas-tiananmen-square-for-an-untold-number-of-americans-and-non-citizen-residents-enduring-us-legal-system-abuse.html  

About 6 years ago when national outcry over police brutality in America was escalating, the thought emerged that even without physical violence an average American could be tortured through persistent violations of his or her rights by agents of U.S. government.


  

Our broadcast guests are leaders of America United International (AUI), a new campaign building on efforts to combat use -- actually, abuse of America's legal system to persecute people with the complicity of presiding judges.  AUI published its latest report on the phenomenon last week titled "An Unseen Forest".  



The related press statement compares weaponizations of the U.S. legal system to being "riddled with injustice" and relates that experience to the 1989 massacre at Tiananmen Square in Beijing, China.  Telling us more about AUI and breaking down these analogies associated with its recently published report will be Belinda Parker-Brown and Dr. Zena Crenshaw-Logal.  

Parker-Brown is CEO of Louisiana United International, Inc., the nonprofit civil, constitutional, and human rights organization that sponsors AUI.


 

Crenshaw-Logal is AUI's Chief of Operations and a former civil trial attorney turned long-time human rights defender.



Join us for this live YouTube broadcast about America United International with Belinda Parker-Brown and Zena Crenshaw-Logal and Walter Davis as producer and moderator. Learn about Americans who are fighting for justice for your families and communities, and winning.

10 AM PST Friday 18 February 2022.  https://youtu.be/QH6yA2fOTBg