Tuesday, October 20, 2015

The Cannibal Courts of Howard County Maryland

THE CANNIBAL COURTS
10/15/2015
RICO REIGNS IN HOWARD COUNTY MARYLAND
RECONSIDERED AND MOVING ON

By Jill Jones-Soderman

The raw rage exploding from the repressed fury experienced with the grief of multiple black lives taken over the past year makes us wonder where is the fury, not yet vented in the wake of so many children lost in the foul atmosphere of the Howard County Courts.

The coordinated efforts of the consortium of Judges, McCrone, Gelfman, and others, guardian ad litem such as Alyssa Cummins, Esq. “Child Protective Services” caseworker's dark presence, in the person such as Bobbi Feher, Caseworker II for the Howard County Department of Social Services present a formidable phalanx to vulnerable, protective parents. Most individuals who labor under the illusion that hiring an attorney and presenting evidence in court, re: domestic violence, child sexual abuse, physical and emotional abuse, will result in the protection and care of their child/children.

The nightmare that awaits protective parents, however wealthy, intelligent, sophisticated they may be, cannot be imagined when they are faced with the onslaught of the organized mob of selected actors, attorney Christopher Rand, psychologist, custody evaluator, Paul Bermnan Phd, Best Interest Attorney, Alyssa Cummins. Circuit Court Judge McCrone, Casewworker II, Bobbi Feher. The list of alleged predator professionals is considerable. Those noted are ones we have personally seen in action, experienced their barbarism and the aftermath of their cruelty. Paul Dasher, PhD, of New Jersey fits this list of individuals referred to by the FCVFC as predator professionals. The actors are interchangeable as per jurisdiction but their nauseating deeds are burned into the hearts and minds of their victims, and spectators, each experience unique and perpetually personal. We have their reports, records as well as our responses to their calumny, alleged lies and multiple acts of alleged malfeasance.

Motivation for such acts is suspected to be huge pay days coming from client fees for legal defenses which mask horrible acts of physical, emotional, sexual abuse on the part of the predator parent seeking to hide venal acts and or to perpetuate their crimes.

Another insight into the motivations for such coordinated efforts and cover ups comes with greater knowledge and experience into the possessed world of child traffickers, pornography and the variety of alleged perverts who populate the courts for personal gain or giving expression to their own private, but shared form of perversion. The family court provides an ample hunting ground for the provision of victims of all sorts as well as those whom seek to cover their crimes – gratification provided on all fronts. It is interesting to note that in family courts, abusers can by pass the criminal justice system by relying on the “discretion of the judge” who can discretely demure to prosecute a predator, claiming that a child “lies, manipulates, has plotted, with the protective parent, against the predator.”

Judge Lenore Gelfman of Howard County Family court spontaneously made an “executive decision” and pulled a case of child pornography and suspected trafficking, off of the trial track and “safely” into mediation. Further, Judge Gelfman allegedly made a deal to offer one of the two children, girls, to the predator father and the other to the mother in a couture custody package. Reputedly, this took care of the case.

Attempts to bring this case to the Attorney General's office as per discussion with a State Attorney – Jennifer Ridder, Esq. for District Court, met with complete resistance and denial that the police refused to investigate the case, despite the existence of hard evidence of child pornography. We explained that submission of evidence of pornography in the complaint sent to Judge Lenore Gelfman was pulled from the evidence submissions in the court complaint, allegedly by Family Court Judge Lenore Gelfman.

Ms. Ridder presented with a chilly response to any allegation that a judge did not respond appropriately and ducked any response to the fact that police refused to investigate an alleged case of child pornography. Ms. Ridder insisted that referral had to be made to the Child Advocacy Center, a fact known and attempted. Referral failed as the police in Howard County had to make the referral to the Child Advocacy Center and did not.

Our experience with the Howard County Police around the case of 11 year old Jase Bouma left us with the impression of a morally bankrupt group of officers, about whom we filed complaints with all levels of government. Martin O'Malley, the former Democratic Governor of Maryland, who appointed psychologist Paul Berman to the mental health committee for Maryland did not respond to complaints about numerous appointees to his government who behaved in a manner that could only be described as unimaginably ignorant.

The multiple officers contacted behaved uniformly with abject depraved indifference to the suffering of a child, exacerbated by failure to investigate claims of a mandated reporter, even when verification of disturbing behavior regarding guns and other weapons in the house existed.

No action was taken other than to joke and criticize the actions of the reporter seeking to protect the well being of a victimized child. The weapons known to the police in the home of Jason Bouma, father of the child Jase Bouma included a Cross Bow and a variety of hunting knives. The failure to pursue investigation of the child pornography evidence or to engage investigation of the known individual initiating pornography, the father of the teen age girl, raises questions as to why investigation was not pursued and why Judge Lenore Gelfman pulled this case from the trial track and placed it into mediation.

The thought that mediation resolved the case by splitting custody with a father engaged in the alleged production of pornography, using his daughter as a subject, raises such questions as to whether or not Lenore Gelfman is herself engaged in the cover up of the production of pornography in Howard County or is somehow complicit in same.

Extensive documentation of the Jase Bouma case 2/11/14 13-C-14-97780&1001Sp000632014, Bouma vs. Bouma authored by Bobbi Feher, Caseworker II, failed to expedite the removal of this child from the hands of his abuser, despite hard evidence that would normally expedite removal. Behavior that appears incongruous gives rise to suspicion that there is collusion between multiple levels of the law, mental health and legal community. Jason Bouma made statements along with his threats to the mandated reporter that he “owned Howard County”, a threat that manifestly gained credibility.

His family lived in Howard County for generations. “Rumors” of wild drinking and wild sexual escapades were never found to be documented in police reports for DUI's or rape charges. The protective parent of the child known to be thoroughly viciously abused was rabidly tormented by every court actor in the family court of Howard County. Ultimately, her child has been so “stockholmed” that there is little left of Jase Bouma's personality or psyche, though his multiple medical conditions have been exacerbated by his 71 pound weight gain (as per the last contact).

The focus of the Judge hearing the CPS case was interested in nothing but diverting attention from the report content, toward which end the focus became a guessing game surrounding who leaked the CPS report to publication. Toward this end the judge set about poling each attorney in court to have them return their copies of the CPS report to the court. The judge next threatened every lawyer with sanctions for having leaked the report, though he was fully aware that no lawyer in fact published the CPS report.

The Judge's intention was to induce a chilling effect on the attorneys in court by referring the case leak of the sealed file to the state's attorney …......... . The ludicrous charade played out by all court actors Alyssa Cummins, Esq. “Best Interest Attorney” and attorneys whose indifference to the child's welfare and suffering was nauseating.

With 20/20 hind sight questions as to the involvement of all members of the legal, mental health community, CPS group involved in the Jase Bouma case may in fact have ties to illicit sexual activity, pornography and child trafficking. Judge Lenore Gelfman was among the cast of characters whom acted in a manner of depraved indifference and excessive cruelty to Jase Bouma and his protective parent Laura Bouma.

Other members of the crew whom an earlier monograph indicated in the choreography of a racketeering conspiracy which included, Judge McCrone, Judge Becker, attorney for the viciously abusive father, Christopher Rand, whose behavior was reported and detailed in among other documents, a 35 page report by a mandated reporter. This report was discredited by Bobbi Feher who lied in her CPS report that was prepared for the court appearance before Judges Becker and Tucker.
Judge Becker filed crippling financial sanctions against the protective parent, Laura Bouma in the amount of $28,000.

Monetary sanctions against Laura Bouma were filed instead of the recommendation, by attorney Christoper Rand, attorney for the father/ accused child abuser, to have Laura Bouma psychiatrically hospitalized because she brought legal actions in the Howard County courts to have her child released from the custody, held by her ex husband Jason Bouma.

Jason Bouma called the mandated reporter to threaten the mandated reporter stating “You have no idea what I am capable of”, in addition to stating that he “owned Howard County”. The mandated reporter who filed complaints against Jason Bouma and sought to have child abuse charges filed against him, then filed police reports against Jason Bouma thus documenting the call.

The child's mother who made every possible effort to remove her son from a thoroughly deadly situation in which the child repeatedly expressed fear for his own safety, in a factual, thoroughly accurate manner described in great detail the circumstances of personal fear and jeopardy in which he was forcibly maintained.

Paul Berman, PhD, the psychologist, custody evaluator whose complaints against him are legion for brutal, eviscerating attacks on the character and veracity of young children. Berman is infamous for testifying in court, referring to children in the hands of brutally abusive parents, referring to the children as being “manipulative liars”, words then echoed by such luminaries as Judges Becker, Tucker, McCrone, and Gelfman, Dr. Paul Berman is reputed to be a special type of alleged deviate. Berman is one whom up close and personally tricks and deceives children in their homes, in their bedrooms, in the company of their loved parents.

We have interviewed and heard the unfolding of events dealing with Paul Berman, from children and adults, harmed by Berman. We have heard stories of how Berman has cried on the living room floor of one child, stated by Berman, out of sadness for what the child endured. The tears did not impede Berman's capacity to order no contact between the child and her beloved parent. Berman's assassination of character, psyche, imposition of the coup de gras phrase, the “parent is of danger to the child'” is the spring board for the alert judge to terminate parental rights and to order supervised visitation to another sector of the killing field.

The factotum member, visitation supervisor paid off by extraordinary fees for court ordered supervision with a child whom the parent, until recently was the major or sole custodian is another nefarious actor in the dismantling of a child's life and in the service of hiding the secrets of the perpetrator/predator parent whom has paid for Berman's services.

Berman is notorious in his protocol for destruction, implementing the same techniques over and over again. It is only when one is able to compare the numerous reports for boys, girls, older, younger, but the story is always the same. The phrases delivering complete destruction, irreparable as part of the chain of command used to buttress false evidence produced through the false instructions provided to parents completing psychological tests where their identity is pinned to their positioning on a bell curve.

We have reports that Berman altered test scores and answers to tests by informing subjects as to exactly how to fill out tests, (incorrectly) or in fact filled in scores himself to portray the best possible, or worst possible picture. Berman is also known, as per parents reports to have neglected to provide instructions for taking such psychological tests as the MMPI.

Berman was appointed to Governor O'Malley's prestigious mental health panel. The former Governor had widely praised Berman and his wife whom has a reputation of being more vicious and predatory than her husband. Their fees for custody evaluations top $30,000. More than 300 evaluations performed by Berman are alleged to be documented in the Howard County courts.

The concatenation of elements of money, power and access to vulnerable populations at the mercy of authorities leads to profound concerns for the child victims of the family courts as described in the aforementioned compendium of cases involving the same cast of characters leading to regrettable outcomes.